Home > Resource Library > Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Learning Objectives

  • Describe the 5th Amendment right to silence and the 6th Amendment right to a lawyer.
  • Identify the main arguments put forth in the case.
  • Explain why the Supreme Court believed a warning is necessary.
  • Identify the impact of the Court’s decision on everyday law enforcement.
  • Analyze the purpose of the “Miranda warning.”
  • Defend or critique the principle that justice must not be obtained improperly.

Overview

This mini-lesson covers the basics of the Supreme Court’s decision that prohibited a suspect’s statements from being used as evidence unless the suspect has been advised of his or her rights to remain silent. Students learn about the 5th Amendment right against coerced confessions and the 6th Amendment right to a lawyer, and how the right to a lawyer is essential to guarantee the right to silence. They analyze the “Miranda warning” and consider the principle that justice must not be obtained improperly.

Access engaging resources with an iCivics account!

Create your free iCivics account and discover standards aligned lessons and games that meet all of your instructional needs. Our nonpartisan classroom resources engage students with complex concepts in ways they can understand and relate to.

Tags

Pedagogy Tags
Mini-Lesson
Writing
History Connection
Tech Options
No Tech Required
Web browser
Integrations
Kami
Nearpod
PDF
State standards icon

View state standards alignment

Search State Standards

Use the Scope & Sequence to help you plan your iCivics classroom experience!

Whether you enjoy finding opportunities within a well-structured sequence of resources or prefer looking around for pieces and bits that can be jigsawed together, our Scope & Sequence documents are a perfect reference point for planning. Scope & Sequence documents are available for elementary, middle, and high school classrooms and list all of our resources in one place.

View the Scope & Sequence