Home > Resource Library > Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Learning Objectives

  • Describe the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and the kind of speech it protects.
  • Identify the main arguments put forth in the case.
  • Explain why the Supreme Court said flag-burning is protected speech.
  • Identify the impact of the Court’s decision on freedom of speech in general.
  • Compare arguments made by dissenting justices with those made by the majority.

Overview

This mini-lesson covers the basics of the Supreme Court’s decision that burning the American flag is a form of political speech protected by the First Amendment. Students learn about the First Amendment freedom of speech and the principle that “the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” They then learn about the dissenting view by distinguishing between arguments from the Court’s majority opinion and the dissent.

Access engaging resources with an iCivics account!

Create your free iCivics account and discover standards aligned lessons and games that meet all of your instructional needs. Our nonpartisan classroom resources engage students with complex concepts in ways they can understand and relate to.

Tags

Pedagogy Tags
Mini-Lesson
Writing
History Connection
Tech Options
No Tech Required
Web browser
Integrations
Kami
Nearpod
PDF
State standards icon

View state standards alignment

Search State Standards

Use the Scope & Sequence to help you plan your iCivics classroom experience!

Whether you enjoy finding opportunities within a well-structured sequence of resources or prefer looking around for pieces and bits that can be jigsawed together, our Scope & Sequence documents are a perfect reference point for planning. Scope & Sequence documents are available for elementary, middle, and high school classrooms and list all of our resources in one place.

View the Scope & Sequence